# Random Forests

@article{Breiman2004RandomF, title={Random Forests}, author={Leo Breiman}, journal={Machine Learning}, year={2004}, volume={45}, pages={5-32} }

Random forests are a combination of tree predictors such that each tree depends on the values of a random vector sampled independently and with the same distribution for all trees in the forest. The generalization error for forests converges a.s. to a limit as the number of trees in the forest becomes large. The generalization error of a forest of tree classifiers depends on the strength of the individual trees in the forest and the correlation between them. Using a random selection of features… Expand

#### Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper

#### 59,026 Citations

Ensemble of optimal trees, random forest and random projection ensemble classification

- Mathematics, Computer Science
- Adv. Data Anal. Classif.
- 2020

This work investigates the idea of integrating trees that are accurate and diverse and uses out-of-bag observations as a validation sample from the training bootstrap samples, to choose the best trees based on their individual performance and assess these trees for diversity using the Brier score on an independent validation sample. Expand

Double random forest

- Computer Science
- Machine Learning
- 2020

To produce bigger trees than those by RF, a new classification ensemble method called double random forest (DRF) is proposed, which uses bootstrap on each node during the tree creation process, instead of just bootstrapping once on the root node as in RF. Expand

An Ensemble of Optimal Trees for Classification and Regression (OTE)

- Computer Science
- 2016

This work investigates the idea of integrating trees that are accurate and diverse and utilizes out-of-bag observation as validation sample from the training bootstrap samples to choose the best trees based on their individual performance and then assess these trees for diversity using Brier score. Expand

Improvement of randomized ensembles of trees for supervised learning in very high dimension

- Mathematics
- 2011

Tree-based ensemble methods, such as random forests and extremely randomized trees, are methods of choice for handling high dimensional problems. One important drawback of these methods however is… Expand

On the selection of decision trees in Random Forests

- Computer Science
- 2009 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks
- 2009

It is shown that better subsets of decision trees can be obtained even using a sub-optimal classifier selection method, which proves that “classical” RF induction process, for which randomized trees are arbitrary added to the ensemble, is not the best approach to produce accurate RF classifiers. Expand

Trees Weighting Random Forest Method for Classifying High-Dimensional Noisy Data

- Computer Science
- 2010 IEEE 7th International Conference on E-Business Engineering
- 2010

This paper presents a new approach to solve the problem of noisy trees in random forest through weighting the trees according to their classification ability, named Trees Weighting Random Forest (TWRF). Expand

Random Forests

- 2016

Tree-based classification methods are widely applied tools in machine learning that create a taxonomy of the space of objects to classify. Nonetheless, their workings are not documented to high… Expand

Classification and Regression by randomForest

- Computer Science
- 2007

random forests are proposed, which add an additional layer of randomness to bagging and are robust against overfitting, and the randomForest package provides an R interface to the Fortran programs by Breiman and Cutler. Expand

Random Forests and Decision Trees Classifiers : Effects of Data Quality on the Learning Curve

- Computer Science
- 2006

It appeared that random forests and individual decision trees have different sensitivities to those perturbation factors, but counterintuitively random forests show a greater sensitivity to noise than decision trees for this parameter. Expand

Is rotation forest the best classifier for problems with continuous features?

- Computer Science, Mathematics
- ArXiv
- 2018

It is demonstrated that on large problems rotation forest can be made an order of magnitude faster without significant loss of accuracy, and it is maintained that without any domain knowledge to indicate an algorithm preference, rotation forest should be the default algorithm of choice for problems with continuous attributes. Expand

#### References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 22 REFERENCES

The Random Subspace Method for Constructing Decision Forests

- Mathematics, Computer Science
- IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.
- 1998

A method to construct a decision tree based classifier is proposed that maintains highest accuracy on training data and improves on generalization accuracy as it grows in complexity. Expand

SOME INFINITY THEORY FOR PREDICTOR ENSEMBLES

- Mathematics
- 2000

To dispel some of the mystery about what makes tree ensembles work, they are looked at in distribution space i.e. the limit case of "infinite" sample size. It is shown that the simplest kind of trees… Expand

An Empirical Comparison of Voting Classification Algorithms: Bagging, Boosting, and Variants

- Mathematics, Computer Science
- Machine Learning
- 2004

It is found that Bagging improves when probabilistic estimates in conjunction with no-pruning are used, as well as when the data was backfit, and that Arc-x4 behaves differently than AdaBoost if reweighting is used instead of resampling, indicating a fundamental difference. Expand

An Experimental Comparison of Three Methods for Constructing Ensembles of Decision Trees: Bagging, Boosting, and Randomization

- Mathematics, Computer Science
- Machine Learning
- 2004

The experiments show that in situations with little or no classification noise, randomization is competitive with (and perhaps slightly superior to) bagging but not as accurate as boosting, and sometimes better than randomization. Expand

On the Algorithmic Implementation of Stochastic Discrimination

- Computer Science
- IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.
- 2000

An outline of the underlying mathematical theory of stochastic discrimination is outlined and a remark concerning boosting is made, which provides a theoretical justification for properties of that method observed in practice, including its ability to generalize. Expand

Boosting the margin: A new explanation for the effectiveness of voting methods

- Mathematics, Computer Science
- ICML
- 1997

It is shown that techniques used in the analysis of Vapnik's support vector classifiers and of neural networks with small weights can be applied to voting methods to relate the margin distribution to the test error. Expand

Shape Quantization and Recognition with Randomized Trees

- Mathematics, Computer Science
- Neural Computation
- 1997

A new approach to shape recognition based on a virtually infinite family of binary features (queries) of the image data, designed to accommodate prior information about shape invariance and regularity, and a comparison with artificial neural networks methods is presented. Expand

An Efficient Method To Estimate Bagging's Generalization Error

- Computer Science
- Machine Learning
- 2004

This paper presents several techniques for estimating the generalization error of a bagged learning algorithm without invoking yet more training of the underlying learning algorithm (beyond that of the bagging itself), as is required by cross-validation-based estimation. Expand

Arcing classifier (with discussion and a rejoinder by the author)

- Mathematics
- 1998

Recent work has shown that combining multiple versions of unstable classifiers such as trees or neural nets results in reduced test set error. One of the more effective is bagging. Here, modified… Expand

Experiments with a New Boosting Algorithm

- Computer Science
- ICML
- 1996

This paper describes experiments carried out to assess how well AdaBoost with and without pseudo-loss, performs on real learning problems and compared boosting to Breiman's "bagging" method when used to aggregate various classifiers. Expand